Pre-catalyst radar

flow as of 2026-07-23

The registered rule, rendered exactly as measured: Resource specialists and investment banks both net-buying ≥$5k the same session · volume ≥2× average · no price-sensitive announcement that day. RSI under 40 and drilling status appear as markers on hits — they never add or remove names. What you see here is what the track record scores; the two can no longer differ.

New this morning — 2026-07-28

surfaced in this export; flow runs ~3 sessions behind, so these hits are already ~3 sessions old
TickerWho's buyingInferred eventVol×ADVMomentumInst flowHit
GNMBanks$13kRes$5kMM$119awaiting assays — 18d3.3×UPTREND · RSI 69$18k2026-07-23

Active — awaiting their 5-session log

AONquiet patternhit 2026-07-22logs in 2 sessions
Who's buying

Wealth & advisers $149k · Resource specialists $114k · Investment banks $57k

What they're doing

no specific event inferred from filings

1 day since last price-sensitive announcement

Cash at hand

no recent filing data

float 46%DOWNTRENDRSI 44vol 3.3× ADVinst flow $171k

Most Likely Driver: The price-sensitive announcement on 23 July (followed by trading halt) combined with yesterday's Couflens Update suggests institutions are positioned ahead of material news resolution or a potential transformational update on a key asset—likely a drilling result, JV advancement, or resource upgrade. The sharp 47% drawdown from 252-day highs and depressed RSI (36) may have created an asymmetric risk/reward window that triggered accumulation despite the downtrend. Single Biggest Risk: The lack of a confirmed institutional buying spike in the dataset (spike = null) is a red flag. If broker flow remains flat or turns negative over the next 3 days (T-3 lag), the accumulation thesis collapses, and the recent catalysts may have disappointed rather than set up a re-rate—leaving the stock vulnerable to continued weakness in an already damaged 20-day trend.LLM interpretation — advisory

full ticker page →

Recently logged

  • BRNhit 2026-07-205d -11.5%
  • LRVhit 2026-07-175d +10.8%
  • EXRhit 2026-07-165d +8.3%
  • MSBhit 2026-07-165d -16.3%
  • KTAhit 2026-07-085d +9.1%

full track record →

full tape →

Accumulation patterns — conditioner & leaderboard

106 historical hits · broker flow through 2026-07-23

Pattern performance
Condition the win rate — pick who's buying, an RSI band, a volume floor, and see how that exact pattern has actually done.
Brokers buying — all of:
RSI
Vol×ADV
Stats for Resource + NIB · RSI any · vol ≥ 2× — they follow your selection.
Win rate
49%
Sample
17 / 35 · 38 total
Median 5d
0.0%
Catalyst conversion
34% · 13 / 38 got a PS ann
calibration analysis (n=35) — in-sample, a lens not evidence
TickerDateBuyingVolRSI5d
GNM07-23
ResNIB
3.3×69pending
AON07-22
ResNIB
3.3×44pending
BRN07-20
ResNIB
2.6×30-17.9%
LRV07-17
ResNIB
2.8×32-1.3%
QPM06-30
ResNIB
2.5×21-30.8%
GL106-29
ResNIBMM
2.5×36+19.0%
KRR06-29
ResNIB
3.3×85+3.6%
TLG06-29
ResNIB
3.1×17+40.0%
GL106-26
ResNIB
5.0×28+2.3%
MTM06-25
ResNIB
2.5×35+4.9%
NEU06-24
ResNIBMM
2.4×39+42.1%
QPM06-23
ResNIB
2.4×-23.5%
ATV06-17
MMResNIB
2.0×-29.0%
DTR06-10
ResNIB
2.1×22+27.6%
HLS06-10
ResNIBMM
2.2×31+25.4%
DYM06-09
ResNIB
7.8×6-1.1%
ATV06-08
ResNIB
4.0×+47.6%
BRN06-04
ResNIBMM
3.9×73-12.5%
PNN06-04
ResNIB
2.2×55-13.8%
CBE06-02
ResNIB
2.1×73+3.6%
PNN06-02
ResNIBMM
2.4×61-16.7%
LIN05-29
ResNIB
7.9×490.0%
PNN05-29
ResNIB
3.6×65+7.7%
SNM05-27
ResNIB
2.1×+5.1%
WBT05-27
ResNIBMM
2.3×-2.5%
PNN05-25
ResNIB
2.5×+30.4%
TLG05-22
ResNIBMM
2.0×-1.7%
TM105-22
ResNIB
2.3×+14.1%
ACW05-21
ResNIB
4.8×+17.6%
CY505-21
ResNIB
3.0×+9.5%
SNX05-20
MMResNIB
3.9×-13.7%
TMX05-20
ResNIB
12.5×0.0%
OR305-15
ResNIB
4.1×-1.1%
OR305-14
ResNIB
2.4×-5.6%
ADV05-13
ResNIB
2.2×pending
GDM05-13
ResNIB
2.8×+5.0%
QEM05-13
ResNIB
3.5×-12.1%
PNN05-12
ResNIB
2.7×0.0%

⚠ Calibration analysis — in-sample, includes live rows, and runs a looser desk test than the registered rule. A lens for exploring, never evidence; the evidence lives on the track record.

Accumulation leaderboard
Ranked by flow as a share of the tradeable float (register-confirmed names), then by flow ÷ dollar-ADV. Absolute $ is shown for scale — it never sets the rank, because it just rewards market cap.
TickerWho's buying% of floatFlow ÷ ADVNet $5dCatalyst
CPO
Banks+MM
79.6%
0.92×$24k+30.0%
AON
Res+Banks
32.3%
2.18×$171kpending07-23 ✓
QEM
Res+Banks
9.3%
0.64×$57k-12.1%
ACW
Res+Banks
9.3%
1.42×$153k+17.6%05-28 ✓
AON
Banks+MM
7.0%
0.38×$44k-5.3%
BRN
Res+Banks+MM
7.0%
1.70×$1.7M-12.5%
DEV
Banks+MM
6.4%
16.90×$3.1M+4.3%06-22 ✓
EMV
Banks+MM
5.2%
2.93×$203k-8.9%
AON
Banks+MM
2.6%
0.20×$14kpending07-23 ✓
TMX
Res+Banks
2.2%
5.13×$69k0.0%05-21 ✓
SNX
Res+Banks+MM
1.8%
0.26×$30k-13.7%
DEV
Banks+MM
1.5%
4.00×$728k+8.7%06-22 ✓
BRN
Banks+MM
1.1%
0.32×$199k+3.3%
BRN
Banks+MM
1.0%
0.23×$239k-7.9%
BRN
Banks+MM
0.8%
0.23×$154k+16.7%

“—” in % of float = no confident share-register read for that ticker; those rows rank by flow ÷ ADV instead.